Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 6:42:08 GMT
Because he considered these words spoken against a person with a political role as satire. It also decided that in the case in question the words were in the form of social criticism and that these forms of expression were indispensable for democratic societies in the free discussion of problems of public interest. (Eon / France, 26118/10, 14/03/2013) In this case, a journalist wrote an article about a politician in the newspaper. The content of the article relates to the politician's ongoing criminal trial. his articles. The word that is considered an insult subject to conviction is the expression "robber mayor" directed at the politician. The mayor was punished for the crime of theft, and the journalist used the expression "robber mayor" based on this trial. The ECHR ruled that Article 10 was violated in the application. He stated that journalists have the right to exaggerate compared to other citizens, and that the mayor, as a public figure, has to show more tolerance towards criticism. (Dabrowski v.
Poland, 18235/02, 19/12/2006) In this case the applicant is France Telegram Number Data a journalist.Because he considered these words spoken against a person with a political role as satire. It also decided that in the case in question the words were in the form of social criticism and that these forms of expression were indispensable for democratic societies in the free discussion of problems of public interest. (Eon / France, 26118/10, 14/03/2013) In this case, a journalist wrote an article about a politician in the newspaper. The content of the article relates to the politician's ongoing criminal trial.
The journalist was convicted of insult for his articles. The word that is considered an insult subject to conviction is the expression "robber mayor" directed at the politician. The mayor was punished for the crime of theft, and the journalist used the expression "robber mayor" based on this trial. The ECHR ruled that Article 10 was violated in the application. He stated that journalists have the right to exaggerate compared to other citizens, and that the mayor, as a public figure, has to show more tolerance towards criticism. (Dabrowski v. Poland, 18235/02, 19/12/2006) In this case the applicant is a journalist.
Poland, 18235/02, 19/12/2006) In this case the applicant is France Telegram Number Data a journalist.Because he considered these words spoken against a person with a political role as satire. It also decided that in the case in question the words were in the form of social criticism and that these forms of expression were indispensable for democratic societies in the free discussion of problems of public interest. (Eon / France, 26118/10, 14/03/2013) In this case, a journalist wrote an article about a politician in the newspaper. The content of the article relates to the politician's ongoing criminal trial.
The journalist was convicted of insult for his articles. The word that is considered an insult subject to conviction is the expression "robber mayor" directed at the politician. The mayor was punished for the crime of theft, and the journalist used the expression "robber mayor" based on this trial. The ECHR ruled that Article 10 was violated in the application. He stated that journalists have the right to exaggerate compared to other citizens, and that the mayor, as a public figure, has to show more tolerance towards criticism. (Dabrowski v. Poland, 18235/02, 19/12/2006) In this case the applicant is a journalist.